As our time on the coastal bend shortens too quickly by the day, at least we'll get to have another fresh fish dinner tonight. Tonight it'll be some yummy gaff catfish caught by Nancy the hook! Fish fear her! And some kick ass jumbo shrimp just caught this morning by our favorite shrimpin' boat, the Polly-Anna. She lives just a few hundred yards from our temporary TX home when not shrimping. If you're around the channel, you can see her head out to sea in the early evening. well it's getting to be that time, so take care my slippery little monkeys. love ya'll, and see you soon.
I generally haven’t posted religious posts but there’s been soon scuttlebutt as to religion being injected into our current way of life by those in power. Mainly from, in my humble guesstamation, the current resident of the white house, congress, and a huge majority of the populous wanting it, or thinking they do. Some say it’s about time to ‘get our nation back on track.’
And others judge you or me saying it’s the wrong sort of christian influence because it’s not their personal flavor. Yet still others say there shouldn’t be any God influence in our government because our founding fathers placed strict limitations into several of the most important documents to found and run this great nation we call America.
The one law or rule that has been beaten up and down over and over by many groups and political parties for their benefit is the the ‘Separation of church and state’. Which as I’m recalling it as, ‘the government shall make or impose no religion upon the people but shall support all legal and recognized religions’. Now many have said that the founding fathers were God fearing men... I would agree, but as the below quotes from some of the founding fathers might suggest they or many of them may have been deists not theists! I just found it interesting. ----------
------- --------- -------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
The Faith of our Founding Fathers, by Dean Worbois
No one disputes the faith of our Founding Fathers. To speak of unalienable Rights being endowed by a Creator certainly shows a sensitivity to our spiritual selves. What is surprising is when fundamentalist Christians think the Founding Fathers' faith had anything to do with the Bible. Without exception, the faith of our Founding Fathers was deist, not theist. It was best expressed earlier in the Declaration of Independence, when they spoke of "the Laws of Nature" and of "Nature's God."
In a sermon of October 1831, Episcopalian minister Bird Wilson said,
Among all of our Presidents, from Washington downward, not one was a professor of religion, at least not of more than Unitarianism.
The Bible? Here is what our Founding Fathers wrote about Bible-based Christianity:
Thomas Jefferson:
I have examined all the known superstitions of the world, and I do not find in our particular superstition of Christianity one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology. Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth.
SIX HISTORIC AMERICANS,
by John E. Remsburg, letter to William Short
Jefferson again:
Christianity...(has become) the most perverted system that ever shone on man. ...Rogueries, absurdities and untruths were perpetrated upon the teachings of Jesus by a large band of dupes and importers led by Paul, the first great corrupter of the teaching of Jesus.
More Jefferson:
The clergy converted the simple teachings of Jesus into an engine for enslaving mankind and adulterated by artificial constructions into a contrivance to filch wealth and power to themselves...these clergy, in fact, constitute the real Anti-Christ.
Jefferson's word for the Bible?
Dunghill.
John Adams:
Where do we find a precept in the Bible for Creeds, Confessions, Doctrines and Oaths, and whole carloads of other trumpery that we find religion encumbered with in these days?
Also Adams:
The doctrine of the divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity.
Adams signed the Treaty of Tripoli. Article 11 states:
The Government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.
Here's Thomas Paine:
I would not dare to so dishonor my Creator God by attaching His name to that book (the Bible).
Among the most detestable villains in history, you could not find one worse than Moses. Here is an order, attributed to 'God' to butcher the boys, to massacre the mothers and to debauch and rape the daughters. I would not dare so dishonor my Creator's name by (attaching) it to this filthy book (the Bible).
It is the duty of every true Deist to vindicate the moral justice of God against the evils of the Bible.
Accustom a people to believe that priests and clergy can forgive sins...and you will have sins in abundance.
The Christian church has set up a religion of pomp and revenue in pretended imitation of a person (Jesus) who lived a life of poverty.
Finally let's hear from James Madison:
What influence in fact have Christian ecclesiastical establishments had on civil society? In many instances they have been upholding the thrones of political tyranny. In no instance have they been seen as the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wished to subvert the public liberty have found in the clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and perpetuate liberty, does not need the clergy.
Madison objected to state-supported chaplains in Congress and to the exemption of churches from taxation. He wrote:
Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.
These founding fathers were a reflection of the American population. Having escaped from the state-established religions of Europe, only 7% of the people in the 13 colonies belonged to a church when the Declaration of Independence was signed.
Among those who confuse Christianity with the founding of America, the rise of conservative Baptists is one of the more interesting developments. The Baptists believed God's authority came from the people, not the priesthood, and they had been persecuted for this belief. It was they—the Baptists—who were instrumental in securing the separation of church and state. They knew you can not have a "one-way wall" that lets religion into government but that does not let it out. They knew no religion is capable of handling political power without becoming corrupted by it. And, perhaps, they knew it was Christ himself who first proposed the separation of church and state: Give unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto the Lord that which is the Lord's.
In the last five years the Baptists have been taken over by a fundamentalist faction that insists authority comes from the Bible and that the individual must accept the interpretation of the Bible from a higher authority. These usurpers of the Baptist faith are those who insist they should meddle in the affairs of the government and it is they who insist the government should meddle in the beliefs of individuals.
The price of Liberty is constant vigilance. Religious fundamentalism and zealous patriotism have always been the forces which require the greatest attention.
And a final thought from me is remembering that I was raised baptist, but I think I have become more 'en-lighted' from my childhood.
Thursday, November 03, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
Where did you find those comments form our founding fathers? They were men of the Enlightenment, which prompts them to put reason above faith. The Enlightenment/Renaisance man did not allow himself to believe in anything or anybody who could not be grasped with one of the five senses. So, they could not allow themselves (if those coments are all true) to believe in God and His Son Jesus Christ as their Savior, a living, active, and personal God. They could not admit that God does indeed live is always "active in the affairs of men', as good old Ben Franklin said one day as the Continental Congress was trying to press forward with a new constitution.
I have a question: Are you typing with your stick thingy, or using dragon or is Aunt Nancy transcribing for you? Because your posts are very large compared to mine, and I can get 70 words per minute. Either way, I congratulate you.
I've heard of and have read some of these quotes before and am somewhat familiar with this line of thinking for the Founding Fathers.
However, the problem I have in making such claims--I would say generalizations, but they aren't as they are very specific since they can be quoted--is that they are quotes from one point in time. Men don't live a life based in one point in time. They therefore can change their minds and move on to back different ideas.
The other problem is that they are taken out of context. Where they arguing a point to prove it could be done (as a member of a debate society), or perhaps writing sarcastically, or perhaps writting a requested paper (such as a student does for a teaching, he may not agree with what he writes, but decideds to argue a particular point in order to achieve a desired grade)? Without reading the full exchange between them and person with whom they were corresponding, it'd be hard to know.
I'm not arguing that these observations are wrong--they may very well be right. But, as I worked in the U of M's archives for four years, I've worked with many Profs' correspondence, and dealt with researchers generalizing a particular point of someone's life to stretch an entire lifetime when it didn't (Profs especially seemed to have changed their minds often in their research and hypotheses). So I thought I'd throw out another observation!
Paul, read Dustys comment. the researcher was Dean Worbois.
Jordan, Yes I type pretty much everything with a sticky thingy. I cut & pasted the article & Nancy does help sometimes, mainly with spelling.
Dusty, nice observation.
Post a Comment